![]() |
Meltdown 101: When Unemployment Last Hit 10% After the last time the unemployment rate entered double digits, it stayed there for several months, through June 1983. By the time the rate got above the 10 percent mark again - hitting 10.2 percent last month - the proportion of workers employed in health care and education had nearly doubled since 1982, and manufacturing employment had shrunk by more than half. Lawyers make up a bigger slice of the work force now. So do people who work in restaurants, hotels and other parts of the leisure and hospitality industry. Here, by the numbers, are some other ways the work force has changed since September 1982. More People, More Workers
The "He-Cession"
ANALYSIS: The greater disparity between men and women in this recession reflects the heavy impact of layoffs in male-dominated fields, such as construction and manufacturing. Industries with higher female employment, namely education and health care, have actually added jobs during the recession. Education Matters...
... But is No Guarantee
ANALYSIS: College graduates still have much lower jobless rates than those with less education, but they are more likely to be unemployed than in 1982. Job cuts in the financial industry and in high-skilled manufacturing, such as the aerospace industry, have caught up with them, according to Gary Burtless, an economist at the Brookings Institution. And companies in all sectors are more willing to cut middle managers than in previous recessions, he added, which also affects college graduates. Longer Joblessness
ANALYSIS: More than a third of the jobless in October were unemployed for 6 months or more, compared with less than 18 percent in September 1982. One reason is that layoffs were more likely to be temporary back then, as manufacturers furloughed workers until demand returned. But last month only 10.9 percent of the unemployed were on temporary layoff, compared with 22.2 percent in 1982. African American
ANALYSIS: While unemployment among African-Americans is higher than the nationwide rate, it is much lower than in 1982. That reflects both good and bad trends, according to Roderick Harrison, a senior research scientist at Howard University. On the positive side, there is a much larger black professional middle class that is less subject to layoffs than was the case 26 years ago, he said. But on the negative side, more African-American men have dropped out of the labor force after giving up looking for work, Harrison said - that means they aren't reflected in the unemployment statistics. More Latinos in the Work Force
Highest Unemployment States, September 1982
Highest Unemployment States, September 2009
ANALYSIS: Manufacturers in the rust belt were hit particularly hard in the early 1980s, putting Midwestern states such as Michigan, Ohio and Illinois in the top 5. While Michigan again has the nation's highest unemployment today, states like Nevada and California are suffering from the housing bubble. (The Associated Press, 11/9/2009) Most Companies Not Ready to Restore Executive Pay Cuts The survey, Executive Pay and the Economic Recovery, was conducted in late September 2009 and includes responses from HR and compensation executives at 187 U.S. companies. Among the findings:
However, large numbers of respondents did indicate their intention to make the following changes:
Long-Term Focus "Companies have moved beyond the short-term frenetic activity that we saw at the beginning of the year," says Andrew Goldstein, North American co-leader of executive compensation consulting at Watson Wyatt. "Now, companies are looking at how they can best address more long-term concerns with structural changes to pay programs." According to the survey, 94 percent of companies expect more scrutiny of executive pay in the next two years as a result of new legislation, Securities and Exchange Commission regulations and public pressures, with almost three-quarters (72 percent) expecting the relationship between pay and performance to improve. Sixty percent of companies reported having little concern regarding proposed say-on-pay requirements, under which companies would be required to offer shareholders a nonbinding vote on executive compensation packages. The majority of respondents appear to be already taking steps by improving their required compensation discussion and analysis (CD&A) disclosure to explain their pay program rationale and appropriateness to shareholders (70 percent) or identifying potential executive pay issues/concerns in advance (67 percent). Still, almost half (42 percent) of companies are concerned about potential legislation assessing executive pay for "excessive risk." Most have taken action to address the issue of risk:
"Companies recognize that changes to executive pay programs will be needed to stand up against growing criticism and increased pressure," says Ira Kay, global director of executive compensation consulting at Watson Wyatt. "However, this change will be a long-term process and one that will require companies to focus on strengthening performance-based incentives, balancing risk and rewards, and meeting proactively with key stakeholders to discuss their pay program rationale." Other survey findings include:
(SHRM's HR Week, 10/19/2009) Mid-Atlantic Hiring Trends Survey, November 2009
For a pdf of the full survey please contact your Alstin Communications Account Executive or email powerofdone@alstin.com Holiday Hiring Off to Slow Start "Retailers are taking a wait-and-see approach, and could decide to bring in extra workers at the last minute," Challenger, Gray & Christmas CEO John A. Challenger said in a news release. He noted that retail employment grew by just 384,300 jobs between October and December of last year, making it the worst hiring season in 19 years. This news comes on the heels of a report that the jobless rate jumped to 10.2 percent, the highest in 26 years. Challenger noted there is one glimmer of hope: Employment at temporary employment agencies grew by 33,700 jobs in October, the third consecutive increase in this category and the largest since October 2007. "This is significant because temporary employment is typically where we see the first job gains in a recovery," he said. "As the economy improves, these temporary workers are converted to full-time, permanent workers." (Philadelphia Business Journal, 11/9/2009) Go Northeast, Young Job Seeker Responding to Criticism on the Web In today's society, Internet communication is essential for running a successful business. However, when used by employees as a means to comment on their workplaces and colleagues, Internet communication can cause employers serious harm. Unfortunately, the law has been slow to evolve in addressing the many workplace challenges associated with social networking -- thereby leaving HR professionals unclear about how best to address issues related to employees who blog. Question: What options does an employer have if an employee makes negative comments about the company or criticizes the company via a blog, Web page, etc.? Answer: Employers have long dealt with problems associated with employees voicing criticism to others. Clearly an employee's criticisms can damage a company's competitive advantage, reputation, recruitment and retention efforts. What some of us may not so quickly appreciate, however, is the potential for employees who are critical of their employers to cause additional harm by either intentionally or unintentionally disclosing confidential employer information or trade secrets through their negative comments. Add to this, the fact that, when disseminated over the Internet via a blog or chat room, negative employee comments can be exponentially damaging because they can be viewed by millions of people the instant they are posted, and are difficult, if not impossible, to retract. Given this reality, it is unfortunate that the law in this area is not yet well-developed. Nevertheless, it is critical that employers refrain from rushing to action when faced with negative comments posted by employees on blogs. This is because, depending on the issues addressed in the blogs, and where, how and when the comments were uploaded, certain state and federal laws may protect employees from adverse employment action in response to the blogs. Taking action without properly evaluating important practical and legal issues will leave employers vulnerable to claims of discrimination, wrongful discharge and retaliation brought by affected employees under state statutes, labor relations laws and whistleblower protection laws. (HREOnline Legal Update, 11/5/2009)
|
|||
|
||||